Hyper politicisation of Indian Higher Education

Published On:

Hyper politicisation of Indian Higher Education

Why in News?

Indian higher education has always been linked to politics. Recently, this connection has grown stronger, affecting many parts of academic life and the honesty of institutions.

How have Politics Shaped Indian Higher Education?

• Political Foundations: Indian colleges and universities have often been started by politicians to help their careers.
• Electorate Demands: Many schools were built to meet the needs of the local people, reflecting India's diverse society. Governments have placed schools in areas that would help them politically, addressing cultural and social needs.
• Naming and Renaming: Universities are often named or renamed for political reasons. For example, Uttar Pradesh Technical University (UPTU) in Lucknow has had its name changed several times by the state government.
• Appointments and Promotions: Sometimes, political influence affects who gets academic jobs and promotions, instead of basing decisions on qualifications and merit. Some states oppose state governors being appointed as chancellors of state universities.
• Academic Freedom: Universities usually follow international standards for academic freedom, allowing professors to teach and publish freely. However, self-censorship is increasing, especially in the social sciences and humanities, with some academics facing consequences for publishing controversial work.

What are the Consequences of Hyper politicisation of Education?

Reduced Academic Freedom: Political influence is raising concerns about undermining academic freedom, with faculty and students potentially feeling pressured to conform to political ideologies. For example, Liz Magill, president of the University of Pennsylvania, resigned under pressure related to her stance on antisemitism on campus.

Global Reputation: A politicized academic environment may deter talented students and faculty from joining Indian institutions, hindering India's goal to be a global leader in higher education.

Reduced Diversity of Thought: When political agendas dominate, it can stifle open debate and discourage exploring different viewpoints.

Potential for Student Activism: Increased politicization can lead to student activism, which can be positive but also disrupt academic life if it becomes too politically charged.

Erosion of Public Trust in Academia: When universities are seen as political tools, public trust in academic research's value and objectivity can diminish, weakening the influence of academic expertise on public policy.

Reduced Research Funding: Politicians with short-term agendas might invest less in long-term research projects, stifling innovation and hindering India's competitiveness in the global knowledge economy.

Reduced Employability: Employers value skills like critical thinking and problem-solving. A highly politicized education that prioritizes ideology over these skills can leave graduates less prepared for the workforce.

What can be done to Mitigate Political Interference?

Institutional Autonomy: Strengthening the independence of universities is crucial to resist undue influence. Encouraging them to diversify funding sources can reduce dependence on government funds. Upholding academic freedom as a core principle ensures free discourse and research. Establishing autonomous university boards can enhance research quality, particularly in politically sensitive disciplines.

Pursuing Autonomous Status: As part of India's effort to create world-class universities, institutions should strive for autonomous status. This enables them to design innovative curriculums, seek diverse funding sources, and compete for recognition as Institutions of Eminence under the UGC Act 2017, fostering a dynamic and competitive higher education landscape.

Implement Key Recommendations: Implement the National Knowledge Commission (NKC) 2005 and Yash Pal Committee 2009 recommendations to grant higher education institutions greater autonomy in academic, administrative, and financial matters. NKC suggests reforming universities by updating curricula every three years, using internal assessments, adopting a course credit system, and attracting talented faculty. Establish Central and State Boards of Undergraduate Education for curricula and examinations and create an Independent Regulatory Authority for Higher Education (IRAHE) independent of stakeholders, established by an Act of Parliament.

Depoliticize Governing Bodies: An independent selection process for vice-chancellors and other key positions based on academic merit and experience can reduce political influence. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 recommends motivating and building the capacity of faculty through independent, transparent recruitment, freedom to design curricula and pedagogy, incentivizing excellence, and promoting faculty into leadership roles. Faculty not meeting basic norms will be held accountable.

Protect Dissent and Critical Inquiry: Upholding the right of faculty to engage in research and express views without fear of retaliation or censorship is crucial for maintaining the integrity of higher education. Clear policies and safeguards should protect academic freedom.

Ensure Student Union Independence: University student unions should remain autonomous, elected by students without political party or authority interference.

Empowered Ombudsman: Establish an independent ombudsman mechanism to investigate and address complaints of political interference, academic freedom violations, or politically motivated harassment from any stakeholders.

Competition in Digital Markets

Why in News?

At the 15th annual day celebrations of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Chairperson highlighted concerns about digital markets. He stressed that these markets tend to concentrate, leading to monopolistic behaviours.

What were the Key Highlights of the Event?

At the 15th annual day celebrations of the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Chairperson emphasized that digital platforms' control over large datasets can create barriers for new players, compromise platform neutrality, and lead to algorithmic collusion.

The Attorney-General for India also pointed out that the monopoly of e-commerce platforms over user data could require scrutiny and innovative legal approaches to balance free markets and social benefits.

Looking ahead, the digital economy offers vast opportunities for innovation, growth, and consumer benefits, but it also challenges traditional competition laws globally. In this context, the importance of tools like behavioral economics to understand human preferences was also highlighted.

What is a Digital Market?

Digital Markets Overview:

Digital markets, also known as online markets, are commercial spaces where businesses and consumers connect through digital technologies.

Examples:

E-commerce Marketplaces: Online platforms like Amazon and eBay where businesses sell products directly to consumers (B2C).

Digital Advertising: Online ads displayed on websites, social media platforms, or search engines, operated by companies like Google Ads and Facebook Ads.

Social Media Marketing: Businesses use platforms like Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter to connect with potential customers, build brand awareness, and promote products or services.

Search Engine Optimization (SEO): Optimizing a website's content and structure to rank higher in search engine results pages (SERPs), increasing organic traffic.

Characteristics Leading to Monopolistic Tendencies:

Digital markets often exhibit certain traits, such as low variable costs, high fixed costs, and strong network effects. These characteristics can result in a small number of firms holding large market shares, leading to monopolistic tendencies.

What are the Challenges Associated with the Competition in Digital Markets?

Market Dominance and Anti-Competitive Practices:

A few powerful players can control a large share of the market, stifling innovation and limiting consumer choice. This dominance can lead to anti-competitive practices such as:

Self-Preferencing: Platforms prioritize their own products or services over competitors in search results or promotions.

  Example: Google allegedly favoring its own shopping results over other platforms.

Tying and Bundling: Forcing users to purchase unwanted products or services alongside desired ones.

  Example: iPhones offer a smooth user experience when paired with other Apple products like iPods and Apple Music. This tight integration encourages users to stay within the Apple ecosystem, potentially limiting their options with other brands.

Exclusive Deals: Locking suppliers or distributors into exclusive agreements, hindering competition.

  Example: Streaming platforms like Hotstar or Jio Cinema securing exclusive rights to shows, limiting viewer options.

Network Effects and Winner-Take-All Dynamics:

The value of a platform increases as more users join, creating a snowball effect that makes it difficult for new entrants to compete.

Example: Social media platforms like WhatsApp and Instagram become more valuable as more users join.

This can lead to:

High Switching Costs: Users become dependent on the platform due to accumulated data, network connections, or sunk costs, making it hard to switch to a competing platform.

Reduced Innovation: Dominant players may have less incentive to innovate as they hold a strong market position.

Data Advantage and Privacy Concerns:

Digital companies collect vast amounts of user data, giving them an advantage in personalization, targeted advertising, and product development. This raises concerns about:

Consumer Privacy: The methods through which user data is collected, stored, and used can be opaque, leading to privacy violations.

Unequal Playing Field: New entrants may struggle to compete with established players who have a rich data set to leverage.

Regulatory Challenges:The fast-paced nature of digital markets can make existing regulations ineffective. Regulators struggle to define and address:

Antitrust Issues: Defining and proving anti-competitive behavior in complex digital ecosystems can be difficult.

Determining Dominance: Identifying and proving a firm’s dominance in the digital market is also a substantial challenge.

What are Possible Solutions to Monitor the Digital Markets Competition?

Proactive Measures:

Designation of Systemically Important Digital Intermediaries (SIDIs):

Identification and Regulation: Identify dominant players with significant market power based on user base and revenue, and subject them to stricter regulations.

Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Practices: Explicitly ban practices like self-preferencing and exclusive dealing that stifle competition.

  Example: A platform cannot prioritize its own products over competitors in search results.

Data Sharing and Interoperability:

Mandating Data Sharing: Require platforms to allow users to move data or services between platforms more easily.

  Example: Allow users to transfer their online shopping cart from one platform to another.

Strengthening the Competition Commission of India (CCI):

Enhanced Resources and Expertise: Provide the CCI with additional powers, resources, and personnel to effectively monitor digital markets and investigate potential anti-competitive practices.

  Example: The 53rd Parliamentary Standing Committee Report recommended strengthening the CCI to address competition concerns in digital markets.

Promoting Innovation with Data Protection:

Regulatory Sandbox: Establish a regulatory framework for startups in digital markets to test innovative products and services in a controlled environment with reduced regulatory burdens.

Transparency and User Choice: Implement detailed regulations requiring platforms to be transparent about data collection practices and provide users with meaningful control over their data.

  Example: The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 aims to empower users with greater control over their personal data.

Conclusion

Digital markets are where businesses and customers meet online. But they come with problems like big companies dominating, worries about keeping personal information safe, and not enough new ideas. We need to find solutions to these problems before they get worse. As the world becomes more digital, India needs to make sure startups have what they need to succeed.