The State of Parliamentary Proceedings

Published On:

India’s parliamentary proceedings are marred by disruptions and declining debate quality, undermining democratic principles.

India’s parliamentary sessions are increasingly unproductive, marked by adjournments and disruptions. The recent winter session saw minimal discussions and frequent demonstrations by both the Opposition and Treasury benches. This lack of decorum betrays the institution’s democratic significance.

Disruptions arise due to weak rule enforcement and diminishing standards of parliamentary debate. Both ruling and opposition parties have contributed, with MPs frequently resorting to unruly behavior and reducing Parliament to a battleground of personal rivalries. Whips enforce party loyalty, stifling individual contributions. Many members prioritize theatrics over substantive discussions, and television coverage has incentivized disruptive conduct.

The quality of representatives is also declining, as public perception now values MPs for constituency services rather than their legislative performance. This shift allows incompetent MPs to be reelected. The Opposition often obstructs proceedings as a reaction to the ruling party’s disregard for accountability and collaboration. Successive governments have treated Parliament as a tool for passing bills rather than a deliberative institution.

The diminishing effectiveness of Parliament erodes India’s democracy by sidelining debate and neglecting the true purpose of representation. It highlights the urgent need for stronger enforcement of parliamentary rules, better behavior from MPs, and a renewed commitment to meaningful debate and democratic accountability.