One Candidate, Multiple Constituencies

Published On:

The article discusses the challenges, implications, and reforms related to candidates contesting from multiple constituencies in Indian elections.

The Constitution of India permits candidates to contest elections from multiple constituencies, but this has led to frequent by-elections and financial burdens. Initially, there was no limit on constituencies a candidate could contest. The 1996 amendment capped this to two seats. However, winning multiple constituencies and vacating all but one seat causes unnecessary by-elections, imposing financial and administrative stress on the public and the state.

This practice often favors ruling parties in by-elections due to mobilized resources and patronage, creating an uneven playing field for the opposition. Financially, it drains resources and disproportionately impacts already defeated candidates. Furthermore, contesting from multiple seats undermines democratic principles, as a leader’s personal ambitions overshadow people’s interests.

Many countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh, allow candidates to contest multiple constituencies, though reforms are emerging. India faces calls for reform due to practical and ethical challenges. The Election Commission of India (ECI) has previously recommended prohibiting candidates from contesting multiple seats, citing the costs of frequent by-elections.

Solutions include holding elections after a year to allow voters time to assess a candidate's performance, limiting resources for by-elections, and balancing electoral processes. The article underscores that democratic integrity requires prioritizing public interest over individual political gains, as frequent by-elections weaken governance and strain public resources. Reforms are essential to align electoral practices with democratic principles.