Imposing Article 356

Published On:

The article discusses the possible need to impose Article 356 in Manipur due to continued violence and breakdown of constitutional machinery.

The ongoing violence and lawlessness in Manipur demonstrate a potential case for invoking Article 356, which allows the President to take direct control of a state when its government is unable to function according to constitutional provisions. The prolonged violence in Manipur since May 2023, with incidents of mob attacks and inter-community clashes, has strained governance, challenging the state's ability to maintain law and order.

The editorial refers to constitutional experts like B.R. Ambedkar and K. Santhanam, who argued that Article 356 is essential when a state government fails to manage internal disorder. Despite over 250 deaths and extensive property destruction, the Union Government has not yet acted, raising concerns about accountability and justice for the victims. Calls for intervention grow as the judiciary struggles with delays and perceived inaction in addressing human rights violations.

The Supreme Court's lack of timely response has further eroded confidence in state and judicial mechanisms, with only minimal cases leading to prosecution. Constitutional experts argue that failure to act weakens democracy and endangers citizens’ rights. The article questions the Union’s and judiciary’s role in addressing this breakdown of order, suggesting that imposing Article 356 could restore governance and protect fundamental rights in Manipur.